Experiential learning methodology
Experiential learning is something we all do, hopefully every day. It is so normal that few talk about an 'experiential learning methodology'. Yet there are key people who engage in this everyday learning - learning by doing. You will come across two to three of them in any experiential learning course:
Experiential learning methodology according to Kolb
David Kolb is a learning psychologist and educator from the United States who focuses on experiential learning. He is known for his theory on learning styles and the learning cycle. [Wikipedia]
Kolb originally talks about four learning styles: doer, dreamer, thinker and decision-maker. Kolb's influence is huge. In our team training on communication styles the four learning styles come back laterally as motivating, caring, researching and directing. You know them with the four colours yellow, green, blue and red.
In the experiential learning course, we start working with the latest version of Kolb and Peterson, which talks about nine learning styles instead of four. The four are still a nice summary, with the nine learning styles you can see even better which learning styles are overexposed or underexposed in a team. In the picture with the pencils, you can find all nine. The doer chooses to try, but experiencing and taking action are just as important. The decision-maker decides, but (self-first) thinking and (self) taking action is something a team cannot do without.
Tuckman team development
Tuckman's stages of group formation, also known as forming - storming - norming - performing, is a psychological model from group dynamics developed by US social psychologist Bruce Tuckman. [Wikipedia]
Bruce Tuckman is a second influential psychologist from the United States who influenced group dynamics insights in forming groups and teams. As soon as a team forms (forming), team members are still individually oriented. As soon as contradictions arise in the new cooperation, a team comes under pressure (storming). You could say that this phase, also called the conflict phase, is the most interesting. In a positive group process, group members use this 'unrest' to reach good workable agreements (norming). This creates a closed and loyal team. To achieve efficiency and growth, it is then necessary as a team to be open to the dissenting voices that come out sooner or later. After which performing brings pleasure and results (performing). Later, Tuckman added adjourning as a concluding phase to his model. This phase has always been somewhat underexposed, but is super important in change processes.
In team development, phases can be recognised, but a modern team develops right through all the phases. Team members come and go and systematics (we are here now) is not really an issue (anymore). Yet Tuckman gives us tools for team development in training as well.
Comfort, Stretch, Panic by Karl Rohnke
Less well known but important are the insights of Karl Rohnke, an American outdoor coach who focused on adventure altitude courses with rope bridges. You can watch in comfort, but you won't learn much from that. You can also choose the adventure and experience 'stretch' high among the trees or hanging from a rock. By doing so, you will learn something new, a skill, and your learning zone will be bigger. In the panic zone, you no longer learn. Rohnke put forward the thesis that life is either stretching or shrinking. So it is also in team development. What does it take to enable a team to embark on a new adventure, or are changes rejected?
Scale of Cooperation
Whether the Scale belongs in this window will soon be up to you to decide. For us, it is essential to 'know' why something succeeds or fails. You can form such a good team, whether a team succeeds, evades or perishes in conflict has to do with behaviour. Kolb plays a role, Tuckman provides insight, so does Rohnke, but at a glance the Scale shows whether a team is going to come out of it or - without behavioural change - actually go down in conflict. Therefore, knowledge of the Scale is an important roadmap for this training.
Theory and practice
The training takes four days. That is quite long and yet also very short. We choose to be mainly practical. Experiential learning methodologies are discussed, are also our guide, but it will not be a lecture. We are going to work practically. The cases contributed by the group play an important role, making every day a new adventure for all of us. Experiential learning, with a theoretical foundation.